Thanks for the suggestion Nikolay Dear Anand, David, I see that https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/seanpaul/dpu-staging/commit/228a73abde5c04428678e917b271f8526cfd90ed may have helped, but is this really something a user should know/do? Why does a device that disappeared from the bus, need to be manually unregistered? Are users really supposed to know this? Why does btrfs device scan not invalidate the cache of devices and keep remembering a device that's gone (not visible in new scan)? Thanks, Marc On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:25:04PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 21.03.20 г. 22:23 ч., Marc MERLIN wrote: > > /dev/sde blipped off the bus (hardware issue?) and came > > back as /dev/sdq. > > Except btrfs won't let me scan or mount it. > > > > I was able to btrfs check it though and that came back clean. > > > > gargamel:~# ls -l /dev/sde > > ls: cannot access '/dev/sde': No such file or directory > > > > > > gargamel:~# mount /dev/sdq1 /mnt/mnt > > mount: /mnt/mnt: mount(2) system call failed: File exists. > > gargamel:~# dmesg |tail -1 > > [2560371.195249] BTRFS warning (device sde1): duplicate device fsid:devid for 727c7ba3-f6f9-462a-8472-453dd7d46d8a:1 old:/dev/sde1 new:/dev/sdq1 > > > > gargamel:~# btrfs device scan > > Scanning for Btrfs filesystems > > ERROR: device scan failed on '/dev/sdq1': File exists > > ERROR: there are 1 errors while registering devices > > gargamel:~# dmesg |tail -1 > > [2560416.434529] BTRFS warning (device sde1): duplicate device fsid:devid for 727c7ba3-f6f9-462a-8472-453dd7d46d8a:1 old:/dev/sde1 new:/dev/sdq1 > > > > gargamel:~# grep sde /proc/mounts > > cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified cgroup2 rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,nsdelegate 0 0 > > gargamel:~# > > > > gargamel:~# lsblk -f |grep 727c7ba3-f6f9-462a-8472-453dd7d46d8a > > └─sdq1 btrfs btrfs_space 727c7ba3-f6f9-462a-8472-453dd7d46d8a > > gargamel:~# > > > > So, that FS isn't a duplicate anymore and I see to have no way out except reboot > > which I'll do now. > > > > Was there another way around it? Obviously this is not desirable > > behaviour, in the past, I was able to remount the device when it came > > back. > > > > Presumably you could have used the device forget functionality that got > introduced in 5.1, i.e the BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV ioctl. For more info > check out: 228a73abde5c04428678e917b271f8526cfd90ed > > > Thanks, > > Marc > > > -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 7F55D5F27AAF9D08
