Re: [PATCH 0/2] Drop some mis-uses of READA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:09:52PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> In debugging Zygo's huge commit delays I noticed we were burning a bunch of time
> doing READA in cases where we don't need to.  The way READA works in btrfs is
> we'll load up adjacent nodes and leaves as we walk down.  This is useful for
> operations where we're going to be reading sequentially across the tree.
> 
> But for delayed refs we're looking up one bytenr, and then another one which
> could be elsewhere in the tree.  With large enough extent trees this results in
> a lot of unneeded latency.
> 
> The same applies to build_backref_tree, but that's even worse because we're
> looking up backrefs, which are essentially randomly spread out across the extent
> root.  Thanks,

Makes sense, I'll add it to misc-next. Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux