From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
Since 1d5b2ad9 ("btrfs-progs: qgroup-verify: Don't treat qgroup
difference as error if the fs hasn't initialized a rescan") a new
message is being printed when the qgroups is incosistent and the rescan
hasn't being executed, so remove the later message send to stderr.
While in this function, simplify the check for a not executed rescan
since !counts.rescan_running and counts.rescan_running == 0 means the
same thing.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
---
check/qgroup-verify.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/check/qgroup-verify.c b/check/qgroup-verify.c
index afe15acf..685370d6 100644
--- a/check/qgroup-verify.c
+++ b/check/qgroup-verify.c
@@ -1336,14 +1336,11 @@ int report_qgroups(int all)
/*
* It's possible that rescan hasn't been initialized yet.
*/
- if (counts.qgroup_inconsist && !counts.rescan_running &&
- counts.rescan_running == 0) {
+ if (counts.qgroup_inconsist && !counts.rescan_running) {
printf(
"Rescan hasn't been initialized, a difference in qgroup accounting is expected\n");
skip_err = true;
}
- if (counts.qgroup_inconsist && !counts.rescan_running)
- fprintf(stderr, "Qgroup are marked as inconsistent.\n");
node = rb_first(&counts.root);
while (node) {
c = rb_entry(node, struct qgroup_count, rb_node);
--
2.25.0
