Re: [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: unset reloc control if we fail to recover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/2/20 7:58 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:


On 2020/3/3 上午2:47, Josef Bacik wrote:
If we fail to load an fs root, or fail to start a transaction we can
bail without unsetting the reloc control, which leads to problems later
when we free the reloc control but still have it attached to the file
system.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 507361e99316..173fc7628235 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4678,6 +4678,7 @@ int btrfs_recover_relocation(struct btrfs_root *root)
  		fs_root = read_fs_root(fs_info, reloc_root->root_key.offset);
  		if (IS_ERR(fs_root)) {
  			err = PTR_ERR(fs_root);
+			unset_reloc_control(rc);
  			list_add_tail(&reloc_root->root_list, &reloc_roots);
  			goto out_free;
  		}


Shouldn't the unset_reloc_control() also get called for all related
errors after set_reloc_control()?

That includes btrfs_join_transaction() (the one after
set_reloc_contrl(), which looks missing), the read_fs_root() and the
commit transaction error you're addressing.


It's already doing unset in the join_transaction right after calling set. These are the only two missing paths. Thanks,

Josef



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux