On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:56:25PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE is solely dedicated for clustered allocation. So, we can
> skip this stage and give up the allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index cb82eaf28033..055097bff12b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -3848,6 +3848,9 @@ static int find_free_extent_update_loop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> }
>
> if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
> + if (ffe_ctl->policy != BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED)
> + return -ENOSPC;
This looks like functional change, unlike the rest so will need some
review still.
