Re: [PATCH 0/3] Clean up supported flags for ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21.02.20 г. 15:02 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> The subvolume args passed as the vol_args_v2 should be separated by the
> ioctl using them, add that for existing ioctls. The upcoming subvolume
> deletion-by-id will add new flags, so this should be considered
> preparatory patchset.
> 
> David Sterba (3):
>   btrfs: define support masks for ioctl volume args v2
>   btrfs: use ioctl args support mask for subvolume create/delete
>   btrfs: use ioctl args support mask for device delete
> 
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c           |  7 ++-----
>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 


For the whole series:

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>


I was only worried about patch 3 but I see you have intentionally done
it this way and I'm fine with this.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux