Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: use ioctl args support mask for subvolume create/delete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 14:02 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> Using the defined mask instead of flag enumeration in the ioctl
> handler
> is preferred. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 7305e6770157..a7872cacd0aa 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1838,9 +1838,7 @@ static noinline int
> btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2(struct file *file,
>  		return PTR_ERR(vol_args);
>  	vol_args->name[BTRFS_SUBVOL_NAME_MAX] = '\0';
>  
> -	if (vol_args->flags &
> -	    ~(BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC | BTRFS_SUBVOL_RDONLY |
> -	      BTRFS_SUBVOL_QGROUP_INHERIT)) {
> +	if (vol_args->flags & ~BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ARGS_MASK) {
>  		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  		goto free_args;
>  	}

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux