On 2/12/20 12:30 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
A completely sane converted fs will cause kernel warning at balance
time:
[ 1557.188633] BTRFS info (device sda7): relocating block group 8162107392 flags data
[ 1563.358078] BTRFS info (device sda7): found 11722 extents
[ 1563.358277] BTRFS info (device sda7): leaf 7989321728 gen 95 total ptrs 213 free space 3458 owner 2
[ 1563.358280] item 0 key (7984947200 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33
[ 1563.358281] extent refs 1 gen 90 flags 2
[ 1563.358282] ref#0: tree block backref root 4
[ 1563.358285] item 1 key (7985602560 169 0) itemoff 16217 itemsize 33
[ 1563.358286] extent refs 1 gen 93 flags 258
[ 1563.358287] ref#0: shared block backref parent 7985602560
[ 1563.358288] (parent 7985602560 is NOT ALIGNED to nodesize 16384)
[ 1563.358290] item 2 key (7985635328 169 0) itemoff 16184 itemsize 33
...
[ 1563.358995] BTRFS error (device sda7): eb 7989321728 invalid extent inline ref type 182
[ 1563.358996] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1563.359005] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 2930 at 0xffffffff9f231766
Then with transaction abort, and obviously failed to balance the fs.
[CAUSE]
That mentioned inline ref type 182 is completely sane, it's
BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, it's some extra check making kernel to
believe it's invalid.
Commit 64ecdb647ddb ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref
type") introduced extra checks for backref type.
One of the requirement is, parent bytenr must be aligned to node size,
which is not correct, especially for converted fs or mixed fs.
One tree block can start at any bytenr aligned to sector size. Node size
should never be an alignment requirement.
Thus such bad check is causing above bug.
[FIX]
Change the alignment requirement from node size alignment to sector size
alignment.
Also, to make our lives a little easier, also output @iref when
btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type() failed, so we can locate the item
easier.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205475
Fixes: 64ecdb647ddb ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
We aren't allowed to have nodesize != sectorsize with mixed, exactly because you
ended up with weirdly sized holes and such. How is convert ending up with this
problem? Thanks,
Josef
