On 2020/2/7 上午8:38, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 2/6/20 7:35 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2020/2/6 下午11:47, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On 2/6/20 12:32 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> Since commit fd0830929573 ("fsstress: add the ability to create
>>>> snapshots") adds the ability for fsstress to create/delete snapshot and
>>>> subvolume, test case btrfs/022 fails as _btrfs_get_subvolid can't
>>>> handle multiple subvolumes under the same path.
>>>>
>>>> So manually disable snapshot/subvolume creation and deletion ioctl in
>>>> this
>>>> test case. Other qgroup test cases aren't affected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Why not just fix _btrfs_get_subvolid? You can use egrep to make sure
>>> the name matches exactly. Thanks,
>>
>> Because we have other requirement, like limit tests.
>>
>> If we have other snapshots/subvolumes, they don't have the same limit,
>> thus unable to test qgroup properly.
>>
>
> That's fair, but we should also fix _btrfs_get_subvolid since we know it
> doesn't work in this case. Thanks,
Sure, another patch will address this soon.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Josef
