On 6.02.20 г. 20:10 ч., David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 05:18:30PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c >> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static noinline int join_transaction(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, >> list_add_tail(&cur_trans->list, &fs_info->trans_list); >> extent_io_tree_init(fs_info, &cur_trans->dirty_pages, >> IO_TREE_TRANS_DIRTY_PAGES, fs_info->btree_inode); >> + extent_io_tree_init(fs_info, &cur_trans->pinned_extents, 0, NULL); > > What's the reason there's no symbolic name for pinned_extents? Also 0 > matches IO_TREE_FS_INFO_EXCLUDED_EXTENTS because it's first in the enum > list. > No reason, I'll change it in next version :)
