Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: Don't submit any btree write bio after transaction is aborted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/5/20 2:10 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
There is a fuzzed image which could cause KASAN report at unmount time.

   ==================================================================
   BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888067cf6848 by task umount/1922

   CPU: 0 PID: 1922 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.0.21 #1
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
   Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x5b/0x8b
    print_address_description+0x70/0x280
    kasan_report+0x13a/0x19b
    btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
    btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0x1cd/0x240
    btree_submit_bio_hook+0x18c/0x2a0
    submit_one_bio+0x1be/0x320
    flush_write_bio.isra.41+0x2c/0x70
    btree_write_cache_pages+0x3bb/0x7f0
    do_writepages+0x5c/0x130
    __writeback_single_inode+0xa3/0x9a0
    writeback_single_inode+0x23d/0x390
    write_inode_now+0x1b5/0x280
    iput+0x2ef/0x600
    close_ctree+0x341/0x750
    generic_shutdown_super+0x126/0x370
    kill_anon_super+0x31/0x50
    btrfs_kill_super+0x36/0x2b0
    deactivate_locked_super+0x80/0xc0
    deactivate_super+0x13c/0x150
    cleanup_mnt+0x9a/0x130
    task_work_run+0x11a/0x1b0
    exit_to_usermode_loop+0x107/0x130
    do_syscall_64+0x1e5/0x280
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

[CAUSE]
The fuzzed image has a completely screwd up extent tree:
   leaf 29421568 gen 8 total ptrs 6 free space 3587 owner EXTENT_TREE
   refs 2 lock (w:0 r:0 bw:0 br:0 sw:0 sr:0) lock_owner 0 current 5938
           item 0 key (12587008 168 4096) itemoff 3942 itemsize 53
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                   ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 0 count 1
           item 1 key (12591104 168 8192) itemoff 3889 itemsize 53
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                   ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 271 offset 0 count 1
           item 2 key (12599296 168 4096) itemoff 3836 itemsize 53
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                   ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 4096 count 1
           item 3 key (29360128 169 0) itemoff 3803 itemsize 33
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                   ref#0: tree block backref root 5
           item 4 key (29368320 169 1) itemoff 3770 itemsize 33
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                   ref#0: tree block backref root 5
           item 5 key (29372416 169 0) itemoff 3737 itemsize 33
                   extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                   ref#0: tree block backref root 5

Note that, leaf 29421568 doesn't has its backref in extent tree.
Thus extent allocator can re-allocate leaf 29421568 for other trees.

Short version for the corruption:
- Extent tree corruption
   Existing tree block X can be allocated as new tree block.

- Tree block X allocated to log tree
   The tree block X generation get bumped, and is traced by
   log_root->dirty_log_pages now.

- Log tree writes tree blocks
   log_root->dirty_log_pages is cleaned.

- The original owner of tree block X wants to modify its content
   Instead of COW tree block X to a new eb, due to the bumped
   generation, tree block X is reused as is.

   Btrfs believes tree block X is already dirtied due to its transid,
   but it is not tranced by transaction->dirty_pages.


But at the write part we should have gotten BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN, so we should have cow'ed this block. So this isn't what's happening, right? Or is something else clearing the BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN in between the writeout and this part? Thanks,

Josef



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux