On 4.02.20 г. 13:05 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
> In btrfs_update_global_block_rsv the lines
> num_bytes = block_rsv->size - block_rsv->reserved;
> block_rsv->reserved += num_bytes;
> imply
> block_rsv->reserved = block_rsv->size;
>
> Just assign block_rsv->size to block_rsv->reserved instead of the math.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
> index 6dacde9a7e93..62e0885c1e5d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
> @@ -304,9 +304,9 @@ void btrfs_update_global_block_rsv(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>
> if (block_rsv->reserved < block_rsv->size) {
> num_bytes = block_rsv->size - block_rsv->reserved;
> - block_rsv->reserved += num_bytes;
> btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use(fs_info, sinfo,
> num_bytes);
> + block_rsv->reserved = block_rsv->size;
Any particular reason why you put the assignment after
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use and not before?
> } else if (block_rsv->reserved > block_rsv->size) {
> num_bytes = block_rsv->reserved - block_rsv->size;
> btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use(fs_info, sinfo,
>
