On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:15:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > Sure but with hch's proposed change to using read_cache_page_gfp() this > > doesn't make too much sense anymore at least for the read path. > > > > Maybe "use page cache for superblock reading"? > > That works too. We might need a new iteration that summarizes up all the > feedback so far, so we have same code to refer to. Per my question on the second patch: why even use the page cache at all. btrfs already caches the value outside the pagecache, so why even bother with the page cache overhead?
