On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:20 PM Martin Steigerwald <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So if its just a cosmetic issue then I can wait for the patch to land in > linux-stable. Or does it still need testing? I'm not seeing it in linux-next. A reasonable short term work around is mount option 'metadata_ratio=1' and that's what needs more testing, because it seems decently likely mortal users will need an easy work around until a fix gets backported to stable. And that's gonna be a while, me thinks. Is that mount option sufficient? Or does it take a filtered balance? What's the most minimal balance needed? I'm hoping -dlimit=1 I can't figure out a way to trigger this though, otherwise I'd be doing more testing. -- Chris Murphy
