Re: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Fix return value while kcalloc fails in btrfs_rmap_block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Fix return value while kcalloc fails in btrfs_rmap_block
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:05:54 +0100
Cc: clm@xxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, nborisov@xxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200115142027.56960-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>, clm@xxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, nborisov@xxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20200115142027.56960-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:20:27PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> In btrfs_rmap_block(), if kcalloc fails, it should return
> -ENOMEM instead of 0.
> 
> Fixes: 767f58cdaf20 ("btrfs: Refactor btrfs_rmap_block to improve readability")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, folded to the patch.

References:
- [PATCH -next] btrfs: Fix return value while kcalloc fails in btrfs_rmap_block
  - From: YueHaibing

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with determining data presence by examining extents?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: update devid after replace
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Fix return value while kcalloc fails in btrfs_rmap_block
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux