Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime
From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:44:33 -0800
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200114085325045.JFBE.12086.ppp.dion.ne.jp@dmta0008.auone-net.jp>
References: <20200114085325045.JFBE.12086.ppp.dion.ne.jp@dmta0008.auone-net.jp>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

On 1/14/20 12:53 AM, Kusanagi Kouichi wrote:

I tested with xfstests and lazytime didn't cause any new failures.

Signed-off-by: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

We don't use the I_DIRTY flags for tracking our inodes, and .write_inode wasremoved because we didn't need it and it deadlocks. Thanks,


Josef

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime
  - From: Kusanagi Kouichi

References:
- [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime
  - From: Kusanagi Kouichi

Prev by Date: slow single -> raid1 conversion (heavy write to original LVM volume)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: allow deduplication of eof block into the end of the destination file
Previous by thread: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux