On 11.12.19 г. 12:40 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> When using btrfs-progs v5.4, btrfs/157 and btrfs/158 will fail:
>
> btrfs/157 1s ... - output mismatch (see xfstests/results//btrfs/157.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/157.out 2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100
> +++ xfstests/results//btrfs/157.out.bad
> 2019-12-10 15:35:43.112390076 +0000
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> QA output created by 157
> wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 9437184
> +wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 22020096
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 9437184
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u xfstests/tests/btrfs/157.out xfstests/results//btrfs/157.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
> btrfs/158 2s ... - output mismatch (see xfstests/results//btrfs/158.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/158.out 2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100
> +++ xfstests/results//btrfs/158.out.bad
> 2019-12-10 15:35:44.844388521 +0000
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> QA output created by 158
> wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 9437184
> +wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 22020096
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 9437184
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u xfstests/tests/btrfs/158.out xfstests/results//btrfs/158.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>
> [CAUSE]
> This two tests use physical offset as golden output, while mkfs.btrfs
> can do whatever it likes to arrange its chunk layout, thus physical
> offset is never reliable.
>
> And btrfs-progs commit c501c9e3b816 ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: match devid
> order to the stripe index") just changed the layout.
>
> So the output mismatch and failed.
>
> [FIX]
> In fact, that btrfs-progs commit not only changed offset, but also the
> device sequence.
>
> So we can't just simply remove the physical offset, but also need to use
> proper helper to get both devid (as its device path) and physical offset
> for corruption.
>
> As long as mkfs.btrfs still uses sequential devid, these tests should
> handle future chunk layout change without problem.
>
> Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
