On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 1:45 AM Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2019/12/10 下午11:42, Filipe Manana wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:39 PM David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:06:03PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 06:22:30PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:01:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> David, > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't see this patch is integrated. Can you please integrated this > >>>>> patch thanks. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know why but the patch got lost somewhere, adding to devel > >>>> again. > >>> > >>> Not lost, but dropped, misc-tests/021 fails. So dropped again, please > >>> fix it and test before posting again. Thanks. > >> > >> With the test misc/021 updated, this patch has been added to devel. > >> Thanks. > > > > So having updated my local btrfs-progs from v5.2.2 to 5.4, I started > > getting 4 test cases from fstests failing: > > Was running with btrfs-progs v5.3.1 before, so not hit the bug... > (And some notrun due to missing make_fail_request config) > > > > > Am I the only one getting this? It's been a while and I can't have > > been the only one running fstests with progs 5.3+. > > Is there any fix around for btrfs-progs I missed in mailing list (with > > devel branch the tests fail as well), or a plan to update the tests? > > I'll look into the test case to fix them, since most of them are just > bad golden output, not a big deal to handle. > > Thanks for the report, Thanks for looking into it. > Qu > > > > > thanks > > > > > -- Filipe David Manana, “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
