On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:32:57AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:22:52PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx> > > > > > > ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to > > > fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively. > > > It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a > > > btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item, > > > let's make the former use the naming from the latter. > > > > > > Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are > > > scripts depending on the current naming. > > > > Ok, though we've changed tracepoint strings as needed, it's sort of ABI > > but also not. In this case the change would affect 4 tracepoints. > > What would you prefer in this case? No change of the tracepoint strings for now.
