Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:25:21 +0100
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191119120733.25827-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20191112151331.3641-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> <20191119120733.25827-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:07:33PM +0000, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
[...]

Added to misc-next, thanks.

References:
- [PATCH] Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES
  - From: fdmanana
- [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES
  - From: fdmanana

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: handle error in btrfs_cache_block_group
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix cloning range with a hole when using the NO_HOLES feature
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES
Next by thread: [PATCH] btrfs: test fsync after hole punching when using the no-holes feature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux