In btrfs_close_one_device we're decrementing the number of open devices
before we're calling btrfs_close_bdev().
As there is no intermediate exit between these points in this function it
is technically OK to do so, but it a) is a bit harder to understand and b)
further refactoring to implement proper error handling in
btrfs_close_one_device() will change the layout of the function.
Move both operations closer together and move the decrement step after
btrfs_close_bdev().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 22a5bd991e47..5ee26e7fca32 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1067,9 +1067,6 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
struct btrfs_device *new_device;
struct rcu_string *name;
- if (device->bdev)
- fs_devices->open_devices--;
-
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
device->devid != BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID) {
list_del_init(&device->dev_alloc_list);
@@ -1080,6 +1077,8 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
fs_devices->missing_devices--;
btrfs_close_bdev(device);
+ if (device->bdev)
+ fs_devices->open_devices--;
new_device = btrfs_alloc_device(NULL, &device->devid,
device->uuid);
--
2.16.4
