On 07/11/2019 07:27, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> +static int gather_dev_holes(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
> + struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info,
> + int *index, struct list_head *list,
> + int max_nr_devs, u64 stripe_size, int dev_stripes)
> +{
Hi Qu,
What do you think of
static int gather_dev_holes(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
int *index, u64 stripe_size,
int dev_stripes)
{
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = info->fs_devices;
struct btrfs_device *device;
int ret;
int ndevs = 0;
list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list,
dev_alloc_list) {
[...]
btrfs_device_info can be derived from btrfs_fs_info, and *list and
max_nr_devs can be derived from btrfs_device_info.
This reduces the number of arguments by 3 and we don't need to pass that
odd 'struct list_head *list' which isn't really clear from the type what
it is referring to.
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
