On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:56:14AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > On 25/10/19 7:51 AM, Anand Jain wrote: > > > > > > On 24/10/19 11:41 PM, David Sterba wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:28:22PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > >>> When both the options (--quiet and --verbose) in btrfs send and receive > >>> is specified, we need at least one of it to overrule the other, > >>> irrespective > >>> of the chronological order of options. > >> > >> I think the common behaviour is to respect the order of appearance on > >> the commandline. > > > > I am fine with this. Will fix it as this. > > Question: command -v -q -v should be equal to command -v, right? No, that would be equivalent to the default level: verbose starts with 1 () verbose++ (-v) verbose = 0 (-q) verbose++ is now 1, which is not -v ()
