On 22.10.19 г. 10:37 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2019/10/22 下午3:33, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: >> On 21/10/2019 17:22, David Sterba wrote: >>> --force was added for a different reason, to allow check on a mounted >>> filesystem. I don't think that combining --repair and --force just to >>> allow repair is a good idea. There's a 'dangerous repair' mode for eg. >>> xfs that allows to do live surgery on a mounted filesytem (followed by >>> immediate reboot). We want to be able to do that eventually. >>> >>> I understand where the motivation comes from, let me have a second >>> thought on that. >> >> So how about adding a '--yes' or '--accept', '--dangerous', >> '--allow-dangeruos' parameter instead of force to skip the warning? >> >> My vote would go for '--allow-dangerous'. > > +1 for '--yes', at least e2fsck has a similar '-y' option. I'\m fine with --yes/-y. It's not just e2fsck but I've seen similar options in other tools as well. > > Thanks, > Qu > >> >> Byte, >> Johannes >>
