On 21/10/2019 17:22, David Sterba wrote: > --force was added for a different reason, to allow check on a mounted > filesystem. I don't think that combining --repair and --force just to > allow repair is a good idea. There's a 'dangerous repair' mode for eg. > xfs that allows to do live surgery on a mounted filesytem (followed by > immediate reboot). We want to be able to do that eventually. > > I understand where the motivation comes from, let me have a second > thought on that. So how about adding a '--yes' or '--accept', '--dangerous', '--allow-dangeruos' parameter instead of force to skip the warning? My vote would go for '--allow-dangerous'. Byte, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
