On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:29:34AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > I was thinking there might be some common code between the > sub-commands in btrfs-progs now or in future, and if the printf() > due to verbose is required in one sub-command and the same printf() > due to verbose is not required in another sub-command (which I > called unwanted message) then we won't have any choice to not > to print those unwanted printf(). > But as this is just an anticipatory only, so probably we could try > global verbose and see how it fares. I will try. I see, but it would be better to have a concrete example where it's problematic so we can figure out ways how to filter unwanted messages.
