Re: kernel 5.2 read time tree block corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for fast response Qu.

I booted into a pendrive live system for the test cause I'm using the
involving fylesystem with kernel 4.19. This time when I mount
>[manjaro@manjaro ~]$ sudo mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt
>mount: /mnt: no se puede leer el superbloque en /dev/sdb2.
and in the dmesg:
[ +30,866472] BTRFS info (device sdb2): disk space caching is enabled
[  +0,017443] BTRFS info (device sdb2): enabling ssd optimizations
[  +0,000637] BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=5
block=32145457152 slot=99, invalid key objectid: has
18446744073709551605 expect 6 or [256, 18446744073709551360] or
18446744073709551604
[  +0,000002] BTRFS error (device sdb2): block=32145457152 read time
tree block corruption detected
[  +0,000012] BTRFS warning (device sdb2): failed to read fs tree: -5
[  +0,061995] BTRFS error (device sdb2): open_ctree failed

So I suppose you need dump output from the block 32145457152 so I pastebin that:
sudo btrfs ins dump-tree -b 32145457152 /dev/sdb2
output --> https://pastebin.com/ssB5HTn7

Please provide the parameter to the grep redirection for: "btrfs ins
dump-tree -t 5 /dev/sdb2 | grep -A 7"

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 14:38, Qu Wenruo
(<quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx>) escribió:
>
>
>
> On 2019/10/15 下午8:24, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2019/10/15 下午6:15, José Luis wrote:
> >> Dear devs,
> >>
> >> I cannot use kernel >= 5.2, They cannot mount sdb2 nor sb3 both btrfs
> >> filesystems. I can work as intended on 4.19 which is an LTS version,
> >> previously using 5.1 but Manjaro removed it from their repositories.
> >>
> >> More info:
> >> · dmesg:
> >>> [oct15 13:47] BTRFS info (device sdb2): disk space caching is enabled
> >>> [  +0,009974] BTRFS info (device sdb2): enabling ssd optimizations
> >>> [  +0,000481] BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=30622793728 slot=115, invalid key objectid: has 18446744073709551605 expect 6 or [256, 18446744073709551360] or 18446744073709551604
> >
> > In fs tree, you are hitting a free space cache inode?
> > That doesn't sound good.
> >
> > Please provide the following dump:
> >
> > # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 30622793728 /dev/sdb2
> >
> > The output may contain filename, feel free to remove filenames.
> >
> >>> [  +0,000002] BTRFS error (device sdb2): block=30622793728 read time tree block corruption detected
> >>> [  +0,000021] BTRFS warning (device sdb2): failed to read fs tree: -5
> >>> [  +0,044643] BTRFS error (device sdb2): open_ctree failed
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> · sudo mount  /dev/sdb2 /mnt/
> >>> mount: /mnt: no se puede leer el superbloque en /dev/sdb2.
> >>
> >> (cannot read superblock on /dev...)
> >>
> >> · sudo btrfs rescue super-recover /dev/sdb2
> >>> All supers are valid, no need to recover
> >>
> >>
> >> · sudo btrfs check /dev/sdb2
> >>> Opening filesystem to check...
> >>> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb2
> >>> UUID: ff559c37-bc38-491c-9edc-fa6bb0874942
> >>> [1/7] checking root items
> >>> [2/7] checking extents
> >>> [3/7] checking free space cache
> >>> cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated
> >>> [4/7] checking fs roots
> >>> root 5 inode 431 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 755 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 2379 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 11721 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 12211 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 15368 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 35329 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 960427 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 5 inode 18446744073709551605 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong
> >>>         unresolved ref dir 256 index 0 namelen 12 name $RECYCLE.BIN filetype 2 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref
> >
> > Check is reporting the same problem of the inode.
> >
> > We need to make sure what's going wrong on that leaf, based on the
> > mentioned dump.
> >
> > For the csum missing error and bad file extent, it should be a big problem.
>
> s/should/should not/
>
> > if you want to make sure what's going wrong, please provide the
> > following dump:
> >
> > # btrfs ins dump-tree -t 5 /dev/sdb2 | grep -A 7
> >
> > Also feel free the censor the filenames.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Qu
> >
> >>> root 388 inode 1245 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 1288 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 1292 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 1313 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 11870 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 68126 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88051 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88255 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88455 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88588 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88784 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> root 388 inode 88916 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
> >>> ERROR: errors found in fs roots
> >>> found 37167415296 bytes used, error(s) found
> >>> total csum bytes: 33793568
> >>> total tree bytes: 1676722176
> >>> total fs tree bytes: 1540243456
> >>> total extent tree bytes: 81510400
> >>> btree space waste bytes: 306327457
> >>> file data blocks allocated: 42200928256
> >>>  referenced 52868354048
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> José Luis.
> >>
> >
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux