Here's the output of btrfs insp dump-t -b 48781340082176 /dev/sda Since /dev/sda is just one device from my RAID5, I'm guessing the command doesn't need to be run separately for each device member of my BTRFS Raid5 setup. http://paste.debian.net/1103596/ Am Dienstag, den 01.10.2019, 12:10 -0600 schrieb Chris Murphy: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:37 AM Robert Krig > <robert.krig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've upgraded to btrfs-progs v5.2.1 > > Here is the output from btrfs check -p --readonly /dev/sda > > > > > > Opening filesystem to check... > > Checking filesystem on /dev/sda > > UUID: f7573191-664f-4540-a830-71ad654d9301 > > [1/7] checking root items (0:01:17 elapsed, > > 5138533 items checked) > > parent transid verify failed on 48781340082176 wanted 109181 found > > 109008items checked) > > parent transid verify failed on 48781340082176 wanted 109181 found > > 109008 > > parent transid verify failed on 48781340082176 wanted 109181 found > > 109008 > > Ignoring transid failure > > leaf parent key incorrect 48781340082176 > > bad block 48781340082176 > > [2/7] checking extents (0:03:22 elapsed, > > 1143429 items checked) > > ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation > > [3/7] checking free space cache (0:05:10 elapsed, > > 7236 > > items checked) > > parent transid verify failed on 48781340082176 wanted 109181 found > > 109008ems checked) > > Ignoring transid failure > > root 15197 inode 81781 errors 1000, some csum missing48 elapsed, > > 33952 > > items checked) > > [4/7] checking fs roots (0:42:53 elapsed, > > 34145 > > items checked) > > ERROR: errors found in fs roots > > found 22975533985792 bytes used, error(s) found > > total csum bytes: 16806711120 > > total tree bytes: 18733842432 > > total fs tree bytes: 130121728 > > total extent tree bytes: 466305024 > > btree space waste bytes: 1100711497 > > file data blocks allocated: 3891333279744 > > referenced 1669470507008 > > What do you get for > # btrfs insp dump-t -b 48781340082176 /dev/ > > It's possible there will be filenames, it's OK to sanitize them by > just deleting the names from the output before posting it. > > >
