We hit the following warning while running down a different problem
[ 6197.175850] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 6197.185082] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[ 6197.194704] WARNING: CPU: 47 PID: 966 at lib/refcount.c:190 refcount_sub_and_test_checked+0x53/0x60
[ 6197.521792] Call Trace:
[ 6197.526687] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x76/0x1c0
[ 6197.536615] btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes+0xec/0x130
[ 6197.546532] ? __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.556482] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x71/0xd0
[ 6197.566910] cleaner_kthread+0xfa/0x120
[ 6197.574573] kthread+0x111/0x130
[ 6197.581022] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.590086] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 6197.597228] ---[ end trace 424bb7ae00509f56 ]---
This is because the free side drops the ref without the lock, and then
takes the lock if our refcount is 0. So you can have nodes on the tree
that have a refcount of 0. Fix this by zero'ing out that element in our
temporary array so we don't try to kill it again.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1->v2:
- I'm an idiot.
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 1f7f39b10bd0..81b2fd46886f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1948,13 +1948,16 @@ void btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(struct btrfs_root *root)
break;
}
- inode_id = delayed_nodes[n - 1]->inode_id + 1;
-
- for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
- refcount_inc(&delayed_nodes[i]->refs);
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ inode_id = delayed_nodes[i]->inode_id + 1;
+ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&delayed_nodes[i]->refs))
+ delayed_nodes[i] = NULL;
+ }
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ if (!delayed_nodes[i])
+ continue;
__btrfs_kill_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
}
--
2.21.0
