When balance reduces the number of copies of data it reduces the
redundancy, use the term redundancy instead of integrity.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 5d35f3f34bd2..9ce975f1ddee 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4032,7 +4032,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
int ret;
u64 num_devices;
unsigned seq;
- bool reducing_integrity;
+ bool reducing_redundancy;
int i;
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info) ||
@@ -4109,9 +4109,9 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
((bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
(fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits & allowed) &&
!(bctl->meta.target & allowed)))
- reducing_integrity = true;
+ reducing_redundancy = true;
else
- reducing_integrity = false;
+ reducing_redundancy = false;
/* if we're not converting, the target field is uninitialized */
meta_target = (bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) ?
@@ -4120,13 +4120,13 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
bctl->data.target : fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits;
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
- if (reducing_integrity) {
+ if (reducing_redundancy) {
if (bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_FORCE) {
btrfs_info(fs_info,
- "balance: force reducing metadata integrity");
+ "balance: force reducing metadata redundancy");
} else {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
- "balance: reduces metadata integrity, use --force if you want this");
+ "balance: reduces metadata redundancy, use --force if you want this");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
--
1.8.3.1
