[PATCH] btrfs: Don't assign retval of btrfs_try_tree_write_lock/btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Those function are simple boolean predicates there is no need to assign
their return values to interim variables. Use them directly as
predicates. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 98f741c85905..b0d1151f62e1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -2913,15 +2913,13 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
 			if (!p->skip_locking) {
 				level = btrfs_header_level(b);
 				if (level <= write_lock_level) {
-					err = btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(b);
-					if (!err) {
+					if (!btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(b)) {
 						btrfs_set_path_blocking(p);
 						btrfs_tree_lock(b);
 					}
 					p->locks[level] = BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK;
 				} else {
-					err = btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(b);
-					if (!err) {
+					if (!btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(b)) {
 						btrfs_set_path_blocking(p);
 						btrfs_tree_read_lock(b);
 					}
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux