> On 28 Aug 2019, at 9:24 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 04:01:04PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.08.19 г. 12:56 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>>> So when searching for BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID it hits. Albeit it is
>>> defined same as BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> print-tree.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
>>> index b31e515f8989..5832f3089e3d 100644
>>> --- a/print-tree.c
>>> +++ b/print-tree.c
>>> @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ void print_objectid(FILE *stream, u64 objectid, u8 type)
>>> }
>>>
>>> switch (objectid) {
>>> + /* BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID */
>>
>> That comment looks really cryptic to someone just looking at the code.
>> Adding case BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID: is better.
>
>>> case BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID:
>
> Both constants have the same value so they can't be in one switch, but
> yeah the comment should be a bit more verbose, just the constant name is
> bringing more questions than answers.
Oh. Hmm. Let me try.
Thanks, Anand
