Re: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Make inc_block_group_ro static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27.08.19 г. 16:43 ч., YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
> 
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1183:5: warning:
>  symbol 'inc_block_group_ro' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> index 3147e84..8cc7768 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group(
>   * data in this block group. That check should be done by relocation routine,
>   * not this function.
>   */
> -int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
> +static int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
>  {
>  	struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
>  	u64 num_bytes;
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux