On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 03:10:56PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I noticed when folding the trace_btrfs_space_reservation() tracepoint > into the btrfs_space_info_update_* helpers that we didn't emit a > tracepoint when doing btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). I know this is > because we were swapping bytes_may_use for bytes_reserved, so in my mind > there was no reason to have the tracepoint there. But now there is > because we always emit the unreserve for the bytes_may_use side, and > this would have broken if compression was on anyway. Add a tracepoint > to cover the bytes_reserved counter so the math still comes out right. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
