On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:17 PM Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/29/19 3:29 PM, Lionel Bouton wrote: > > For another reference point, my personal laptop reports 17 days of > > uptime on 5.2.0-arch2-1-ARCH. > > I use BTRFS both over LUKS over LVM and directly over LVM. The system > > is suspended during the night and running otherwise (probably more > > than 16 hours a day). > > > > I don't have any problem so far. I'll reboot right away and reply to > > this message (if you see it and not a reply shortly after, there might > > be a bug affecting me too). > > > Well I had upgraded 3 machines to 5.2 (One Arch and 2 Manjaros). > > The Arch broke 2 BTRFS filesystems residing on 2 different disks that > had been perfectly reliable ever before. > > The 2 Manjaros did not exhibit trouble so far but I use these 2 very > little and I preferred to revert back to 5.1 in a hurry before I break > my backup machines as badly as my main machine :-/ > > My Arch first broke its BTRFS main FS and I told myself it was years > old, so maybe some old corruption undetected by scrub so far... Maybe you could zoom-in a bit more on the kernel (and btrfs-progs) binary. Does Arch do any changes to the kernel.org version 5.2.0 ? And what configuration is used? Or did you create/compile things by yourself? What compiler version is used?
