> On 4 Jul 2019, at 7:39 AM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 06:16:54AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: >> >> >>> On 4 Jul 2019, at 12:09 AM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:30:17AM -0700, Anand Jain wrote: >>>> From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> The cli 'btrfs inspect dump-tree <dev>' will scan for the partner devices >>>> if any by default. >>>> >>>> So as of now you can not inspect each mirrored device independently. >>>> >>>> This patch adds noscan option, which when used won't scan the system for >>>> the partner devices, instead it just uses the devices provided in the >>>> argument. >>>> >>>> For example: >>>> btrfs inspect dump-tree --noscan <dev> [<dev>..] >>>> >>>> This helps to debug degraded raid1 and raid10. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This makes misc-test/021-image-multi-devices fail >>> >>> ====== RUN CHECK root_helper mount /dev/loop2 .../btrfs-progs/tests//mnt >>> ====== RUN CHECK md5sum .../btrfs-progs/tests//mnt/foobar >>> md5sum: .../btrfs-progs/tests//mnt/foobar: Input/output error >>> failed: md5sum .../btrfs-progs/tests//mnt/foobar >>> ====== RUN CHECK root_helper umount .../btrfs-progs/tests//mnt >>> ====== RUN CHECK root_helper losetup -d /dev/loop2 >>> ====== RUN CHECK root_helper losetup -d /dev/loop3 >>> >>> note the md5sum error, that does not happen otherwise >> >> >> I am on devel. It runs fine. Test-misc/021 doesn’t use dump-tree at all. >> Its strange that mnt/foobar fails to read in your case. > > Sorry, I replied to the wrong patch, > it's the other one "btrfs-progs: > dump-tree: add noscan option”. Typo in the other one? Because "dump-tree: add noscan option” is this.
