Hello, David. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:54:42PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > However, as it's rc5, I'm not at all comfortable to add this patchset to > 5.3 queue, the changes seem to be intrusive and redoing bio submission > path is something that will affect all workloads. I did quick tests on > fstests (without cgruops enabled) and this was fine, but that's the > minimum that must work. Wider range of workloads would be needed, I can > do that with mmtests, but all of that means that 5.3 is infeasible. Sure thing. These aren't urgent in any way. > So this opens more possibilites regarding the patchset routing. Both > parts can go separately through their usual trees. Yeah, that sounds great too. Let's wait for Jens's review and decide how to route the patches. Thanks. -- tejun
