Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 04:43:42PM +0100, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +		btrfs_warn_rl(root_dst->fs_info,
> +"Can not deduplicate to root %llu while send operations are using it (%d in progress)",
> +			      root_dst->root_key.objectid,
> +			      root_dst->send_in_progress);

The test btrfs/187 stresses this code and the logs are flooded by the
messages, even ratelimited.

[ 7276.358431] btrfs_extent_same: 152 callbacks suppressed
[ 7276.358434] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.473264] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.476145] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.481035] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.509456] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.531005] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7276.654349] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7276.659043] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.664147] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7276.667872] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.386168] btrfs_extent_same: 151 callbacks suppressed
[ 7281.386171] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.391417] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7281.402340] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.424163] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.443574] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7281.559380] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.565187] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7281.569269] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7281.572955] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7281.603316] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.479641] btrfs_extent_same: 155 callbacks suppressed
[ 7286.479644] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.493800] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.497717] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.508728] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7286.541218] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.655025] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7286.659737] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7286.673313] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7286.678633] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7286.699049] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7291.485963] btrfs_extent_same: 155 callbacks suppressed
[ 7291.485966] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7291.504093] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7291.508731] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7291.524168] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7291.539922] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7291.656334] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7291.661194] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7291.663548] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7291.677950] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 263 while send operations are using it (1 in progress)
[ 7291.690344] BTRFS warning (device vdb): cannot deduplicate to root 260 while send operations are using it (2 in progress)
[ 7296.555685] btrfs_extent_same: 160 callbacks suppressed

I wonder if the test is rather artificail (and that's fine for the testing
purposes) or if the number of messages would repeat under normal conditions.

We don't need to print the message each time the dedup tries to acces a
snapshot under send, so keeping track if the message has been sent already
would be less intrusive and still provide the information.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux