20.04.2019 23:19, Adam Borowski пишет: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 12:46:16PM +0200, Juergen Sauer wrote: >> I wish a happy Easer Days before :) > > Same to you! > >> During my tests with BTRFS as Raid5 setup, I found a courious little >> "problem". > >> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 9.98TiB >> devid 1 size 9.09TiB used 4.99TiB path /dev/sdb1 >> devid 2 size 5.46TiB used 4.99TiB path /dev/sdc1 >> devid 3 size 5.46TiB used 4.99TiB path /dev/sde1 > >> All patitioins sdb1 sdc1 sde1 are the same size: 9.0 TiB. But BTRFS ist >> not using the bigger space on sdc1, sde1, there is only 5.46 TiB used, >> even there are 9.0 Tib Avaible, so 4.0 TiB are unused. > > It's working as expected: while btrfs does RAID per block group rather than > per whole block device, there's no way to place a raid5 block group in a way > that doesn't require at least 3 devices. This means with a 3-disk setup the > space utilized will be only as big as the smallest one. > But as reported, all drives were replaced by larger ones but only one drive shows increased size: "All patitioins sdb1 sdc1 sde1 are the same size".
