Re: volumes.c:1762: btrfs_chunk_readonly: BUG_ON `!ce` triggered, value 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adding to last email, being more brave to test out commands now:

Different crash than on last report.

Command:

# btrfs check --init-extent-tree --mode=lowmem -p /dev/sdh

#########

$ btrfs check --init-extent-tree --mode=lowmem -p /dev/sdh
WARNING: low-memory mode repair support is only partial
Opening filesystem to check...
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdh
UUID: 8b19ff46-3f42-4f51-be6b-5fc8a7d8f2cd
Creating a new extent tree
Failed to find [6815744, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977238528 parent 0 root 10  owner 2 offset 0
Failed to find [6815744, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977254912 parent 0 root 10  owner 1 offset 0
Failed to find [6815744, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977271296 parent 0 root 10  owner 0 offset 0
Failed to find [6815744, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977287680 parent 0 root 10  owner 1 offset 0
Failed to find [6815744, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977304064 parent 0 root 10  owner 0 offset 0
parent transid verify failed on 55431977353216 wanted 60235 found 60236
Ignoring transid failure
Failed to find [55431977238528, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977320448 parent 0 root 1  owner 1 offset 0
Failed to find [55431977238528, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977336832 parent 0 root 1  owner 0 offset 0
Failed to find [55431977353216, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55431977369600 parent 0 root 1  owner 0 offset 0
[1/7] checking root items... skipped
ERROR: extent[1048576 16384] backref lost (owner: 3, level: 1) root 3

## (shortened - same output repeating several times)

Added an extent item [1048576 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 1048576 root 3
ERROR: extent[1064960 16384] backref lost (owner: 3, level: 0) root 3
Added an extent item [1064960 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 1064960 root 3
ERROR: Dev extent's total-byte 15123666173952 is not equal to bytes-used 15121518690304 in dev[1, 204, 1]
ERROR: Dev extent's total-byte 15123687145472 is not equal to bytes-used 15121539661824 in dev[1, 204, 2]
ERROR: Dev extent's total-byte 15123653591040 is not equal to bytes-used 15121506107392 in dev[1, 204, 3]
ERROR: Dev extent's total-byte 15123653591040 is not equal to bytes-used 15121506107392 in dev[1, 204, 4]
ERROR: extent[1163264 16384] backref lost (owner: 3, level: 0) root 3
Added an extent item [1163264 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 1163264 root 3
ERROR: extent[1179648 16384] backref lost (owner: 3, level: 0) root 3
Added an extent item [1179648 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 1179648 root 3
ERROR: extent[1196032 16384] backref lost (owner: 3, level: 0) root 3
Added an extent item [55431977877504 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 55431977877504 root 1
ERROR: extent[55431977861120 16384] backref lost (owner: 10, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [55431977861120 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 55431977861120 root 1
ERROR: extent[54142438047744 16384] backref lost (owner: 10, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [54142438047744 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 54142438047744 root 1
ERROR: extent [54142438047744 16384] referencer bytenr mismatch, wanted: 54142438047744, have: 55432766324736
Delete backref in extent [54142438047744 16384]
Failed to find [55432521760768, 168, 16384]    (0:00:06 elapsed, 225 items checked)
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55432762015744 parent 0 root 10  owner 0 offset 0
transaction.c:168: btrfs_commit_transaction: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -5
btrfs[0x43ebef]
btrfs(btrfs_commit_transaction+0x89)[0x43f07a]
btrfs[0x47baec]
btrfs(check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem+0x1a4)[0x47c8b2]
btrfs(cmd_check+0x1e34)[0x460cd4]
btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f6ce4825b35]
btrfs[0x40c509]
[1]    1049 abort      btrfs check --init-extent-tree --mode=lowmem -p /dev/sdh


###

And on another run of the same command, yet another crash:

###



ERROR: extent[34096057876480 16384] backref lost (owner: 1, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [34096057876480 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 34096057876480 root 1
ERROR: extent[3543721410560 16384] backref lost (owner: 1, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [3543721410560 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 3543721410560 root 1
ERROR: extent[55432521760768 16384] backref lost (owner: 10, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [55432521760768 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 55432521760768 root 1
ERROR: extent[55431977877504 16384] backref lost (owner: 10, level: 0) root 1
Added an extent item [55431977877504 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 55431977877504 root 1
check/mode-lowmem.c:4588: walk_down_tree: Warning: assertion `1` failed, value 1
btrfs[0x478fb4]
btrfs(check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem+0x4b)[0x47c759]
btrfs(cmd_check+0x1e34)[0x460cd4]
btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f348d9a4b35]
btrfs[0x40c509]
check/mode-lowmem.c:4588: walk_down_tree: Warning: assertion `1` failed, value 1
btrfs[0x478fb4]
btrfs(check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem+0x4b)[0x47c759]
btrfs(cmd_check+0x1e34)[0x460cd4]
btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f348d9a4b35]
btrfs[0x40c509]
ERROR: extent[55432747909120 16384] backref lost (owner: 10, level: 1) root 1
Added an extent item [55432747909120 16384]
Added one tree block ref start 55432747909120 root 1
ctree.c:1725: leaf_space_used: Warning: assertion `data_len < 0` failed, value 1
btrfs[0x40cb13]
btrfs(btrfs_leaf_free_space+0x7f)[0x40ee06]
btrfs[0x474092]
btrfs[0x47906f]
btrfs(check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem+0x4b)[0x47c759]
btrfs(cmd_check+0x1e34)[0x460cd4]
btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f348d9a4b35]
btrfs[0x40c509]
leaf is not a leaf 55432747909120
ERROR: extent [55431977877504 16384] referencer bytenr mismatch, wanted: 55431977877504, have: 55432766324736
Delete backref in extent [55431977877504 16384]
ERROR: extent [55432747909120 16384] referencer bytenr mismatch, wanted: 55432747909120, have: 55432766324736
Delete backref in extent [55432747909120 16384]
Failed to find [55432521760768, 168, 16384]
btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 55432746516480 parent 0 root 10  owner 0 offset 0
transaction.c:168: btrfs_commit_transaction: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -5
btrfs[0x43ebef]
btrfs(btrfs_commit_transaction+0x89)[0x43f07a]
btrfs[0x47baec]
btrfs(check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem+0x1a4)[0x47c8b2]
btrfs(cmd_check+0x1e34)[0x460cd4]
btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f348d9a4b35]
btrfs[0x40c509]
[1]    1652 abort      btrfs check --init-extent-tree --mode=lowmem -p /dev/sdh



‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:21 PM, berodual_xyz <berodual_xyz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear list,
>
> following from earlier this weeks case of attempting data rescue on a corrupt FS, we have now cloned all devices and can do potentially dangerous rescue attempts (since we can re-clone the original disks).
>
> On kernel 4.20.17 and btrfs-progs 4.20.2:
>
> --
>
> $ btrfs inspect-internal tree-stats /dev/sdh
> parent transid verify failed on 1048576 wanted 60234 found 60230
> parent transid verify failed on 1048576 wanted 60234 found 60230
> Ignoring transid failure
> volumes.c:1762: btrfs_chunk_readonly: BUG_ON `!ce` triggered, value 1
> btrfs[0x426fdc]
> btrfs(btrfs_chunk_readonly+0x98)[0x429acd]
> btrfs(btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1c1)[0x41cd44]
> btrfs(btrfs_setup_all_roots+0x368)[0x416540]
> btrfs[0x416a8a]
> btrfs(open_ctree_fs_info+0xd0)[0x416bcc]
> btrfs(open_ctree+0x75)[0x416c61]
> btrfs(cmd_inspect_tree_stats+0xfa)[0x4706ad]
> btrfs(handle_command_group+0x5d)[0x40c7b3]
> btrfs(cmd_inspect+0x15)[0x4499f1]
> btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f0f26c7cb35]
> btrfs[0x40c509]
> [1] 15273 abort btrfs inspect-internal tree-stats /dev/sdh
>
> ###
>
> $ btrfs rescue zero-log /dev/sdh
> parent transid verify failed on 1048576 wanted 60234 found 60230
> parent transid verify failed on 1048576 wanted 60234 found 60230
> Ignoring transid failure
> volumes.c:1762: btrfs_chunk_readonly: BUG_ON `!ce` triggered, value 1
> btrfs[0x426fdc]
> btrfs(btrfs_chunk_readonly+0x98)[0x429acd]
> btrfs(btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1c1)[0x41cd44]
> btrfs(btrfs_setup_all_roots+0x368)[0x416540]
> btrfs[0x416a8a]
> btrfs(open_ctree_fs_info+0xd0)[0x416bcc]
> btrfs(open_ctree+0x75)[0x416c61]
> btrfs[0x4657ff]
> btrfs(handle_command_group+0x5d)[0x40c7b3]
> btrfs(cmd_rescue+0x15)[0x465b98]
> btrfs(main+0x24a)[0x40ca02]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f4507ab1b35]
> btrfs[0x40c509]
> [1] 30211 abort btrfs rescue zero-log /dev/sdh
>
> ###
>
> Even if we will not be able to recover the data, adding these traces here hopefully helps enhancing the tools in the future as a crash is most definitely not the "expected behavior".
>
> Have a nice weekend and I hope to receive some feedback.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Marcel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux