On 4.02.19 г. 15:25 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 15:50, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index 888d72dda794..25dab68070dc 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -4498,6 +4498,15 @@ void btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction(struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans,
>> ASSERT(list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs));
>> ASSERT(list_empty(&cur_trans->io_bgs));
>>
>> + while (!list_empty(&cur_trans->dev_update_list)) {
>> + struct btrfs_device *dev;
>> +
>> + dev = list_first_entry(&cur_trans->dev_update_list,
>> + struct btrfs_device,
>> + post_commit_list);
>> + list_del_init(&dev->post_commit_list);
>> + }
>> +
>
> Why not?
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, &cur_trans->dev_update_list,
> post_commit_list)
> list_del_init(&dev->post_commit_list);
Yep, that should work as well, given that there could be no new updates
in the transaction at the point we are cleaning it up.
>
