Re: RAID56 Warning on "multiple serious data-loss bugs"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-01-26 7:07 a.m., waxhead wrote:


> 
> What effect exactly the write hole might have on *data* is not pointed
> out in detail, but I would imagine that for some it might be desirable
> to run a btrfs filesystem with metadata in "RAID" 1/10 mode and data in
> "RAID" 5/6.
> 

One big problem here is that neither Raid 1 nor Raid 10 currently have
configurable # of Mirrors, (N devices), so it's impossible to get 2
device failure redundancy.  (No point in using Raid 6 then, that's just
wasting space.)
begin:vcard
fn:Remi Gauvin
n:Gauvin;Remi
org:Georgian Infotech
adr:;;3-51 Sykes St. N.;Meaford;ON;N4L 1X3;Canada
email;internet:remi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel;work:226-256-1545
version:2.1
end:vcard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux