Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:47:37 +0100
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190123071518.2528-1-wqu@suse.com>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20190123071518.2528-1-wqu@suse.com>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:15:11PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> v5:
> - Use Josef's superior qgroup deadlock fix.
>   No performance regression now.

Does this pass fstests on your side? Namely if test btrfs/007 does not
crash,
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190123135120.GT2900@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
  - From: Qu Wenruo
- Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
  - From: Qu Wenruo

References:
- [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
  - From: Qu Wenruo

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 072/117] btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix more DUP stripe size handling
Next by Date: Re: Incremental receive completes succesfully despite missing files
Previous by thread: Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
Next by thread: Re: [Patch v5 0/7] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux