Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: add kernel scrub log messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:15:12AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> scrub kernel messages helps debug and audit, add them to the log.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index 902819d3cf41..d7a92521019e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -3876,6 +3876,7 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
>  	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->scrub_lock);
>  
>  	if (!is_dev_replace) {
> +		btrfs_info(fs_info, "scrub: devid %llu %s", devid, "started");

Why do you print a fixed and known string using %s?

>  		/*
>  		 * by holding device list mutex, we can
>  		 * kick off writing super in log tree sync.
> @@ -3897,6 +3898,10 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
>  	if (progress)
>  		memcpy(progress, &sctx->stat, sizeof(*progress));
>  
> +	if (!is_dev_replace)
> +		btrfs_info(fs_info, "scrub: devid %llu %s:%d",
> +			   devid, ret ? "not finished":"finished", ret);

Spaces around binary operators please: ret ? "not finished" : "finished"

What's the reason to print the error code here? It is returned from the
ioctl.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux