Core btree functions in btrfs generally return 0 when an item is found, 1 in
case the sought item cannot be found and <0 when an error happens. Consolidate
the checks for those conditions in one 'if () {} else if () {}' struct rather
than 2 separate 'if () {}' statements. This emphasizes that the handling code
pertains to a single function. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
---
V2:
* Properly describe return value convention in changelog no other changes.
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index fe25f66a98d9..511d3b314af2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6801,9 +6801,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
if (ret < 0) {
err = ret;
goto out;
- }
-
- if (ret != 0) {
+ } else if (ret > 0) {
if (path->slots[0] == 0)
goto not_found;
path->slots[0]--;
@@ -6853,8 +6851,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
if (ret < 0) {
err = ret;
goto out;
- }
- if (ret > 0)
+ } else if (ret > 0)
goto not_found;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
}
--
2.17.1