On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Stupid fixes. Made on 4.20-rc4, and ported on linux-next (next-20181128). Thanks, such patches are accepted once in a while when the amount of new typo fixes becomes noticeable. > fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/compression.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/file.c | 6 +++--- > fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 +++++----- > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/lzo.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 14 +++++++------- > fs/btrfs/qgroup.h | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c | 6 +++--- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 ++++---- > fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 6 +++--- > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 ++++---- > 27 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) Approves. > @@ -1010,14 +1010,14 @@ int btrfs_lookup_extent_info(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > * > * - multiple snapshots, subvolumes, or different generations in one subvol > * - different files inside a single subvolume > - * - different offsets inside a file (bookend extents in file.c) > + * - different offsets inside a file (booked extents in file.c) > * > * The extent ref structure for the implicit back refs has fields for: > * > * - Objectid of the subvolume root > * - objectid of the file holding the reference > * - original offset in the file > - * - how many bookend extents > + * - how many booked extents Please note that 'bookend' is not a typo here. The meaning used for btrfs is close to 2a or 2b in https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bookend and refers to the mechanism how blocks are shared by extents and lengthier explanation would show why snapshots are so cheap (I really tried to write a tl;dr version, but nope).
