[PATCH] Proposal for more detail in scrub doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wise words from Qu:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg82557.html
---
 Documentation/btrfs-scrub.asciidoc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-scrub.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-scrub.asciidoc
index 4c49269..1fc085c 100644
--- a/Documentation/btrfs-scrub.asciidoc
+++ b/Documentation/btrfs-scrub.asciidoc
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ and metadata blocks from all devices and verify checksums. Automatically repair
 corrupted blocks if there's a correct copy available.
 
 NOTE: Scrub is not a filesystem checker (fsck) and does not verify nor repair
-structural damage in the filesystem.
+structural damage in the filesystem. It only checks csum of data and tree blocks,
+it doesn't ensure the content of tree blocks are OK.
 
 The user is supposed to run it manually or via a periodic system service. The
 recommended period is a month but could be less. The estimated device bandwidth
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.28.g8a4ee09a8a




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux