Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] btrfs: add helper function describe_block_group()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:17:10PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Improve on describe_relocation() add a common helper function to describe
> the block groups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4.1->v5: Initialize buf[128] to null.
> v4->v4.1: Use strcpy(buf, "|NONE"); as in the original
> v3->v4: Just pass full flag name in the define DESCRIBE_FLAG(flag,..),
> 	 so that it can be used at couple of more places.
> 	Rename describe_block_groups() to btrfs_describe_block_groups().
> 	Drop useless return u32.
> v3:	Born.
> 
>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 30 +++---------------------------
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c    | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.h    |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> index 924116f654a1..0373b3cc1d36 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> @@ -4184,37 +4184,13 @@ static struct reloc_control *alloc_reloc_control(void)
>  static void describe_relocation(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  				struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group)
>  {
> -	char buf[128];		/* prefixed by a '|' that'll be dropped */
> -	u64 flags = block_group->flags;
> +	char buf[128] = {'\0'};
>  
> -	/* Shouldn't happen */
> -	if (!flags) {
> -		strcpy(buf, "|NONE");
> -	} else {
> -		char *bp = buf;
> -
> -#define DESCRIBE_FLAG(f, d) \
> -		if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_##f) { \
> -			bp += snprintf(bp, buf - bp + sizeof(buf), "|%s", d); \
> -			flags &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_##f; \
> -		}
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(DATA,     "data");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(SYSTEM,   "system");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(METADATA, "metadata");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID0,    "raid0");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID1,    "raid1");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(DUP,      "dup");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID10,   "raid10");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID5,    "raid5");
> -		DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID6,    "raid6");
> -		if (flags)
> -			snprintf(bp, buf - bp + sizeof(buf), "|0x%llx", flags);
> -#undef DESCRIBE_FLAG
> -	}
> +	btrfs_describe_block_groups(block_group->flags, buf, sizeof(buf));
>  
>  	btrfs_info(fs_info,
>  		   "relocating block group %llu flags %s",
> -		   block_group->key.objectid, buf + 1);
> +		   block_group->key.objectid, buf);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index f435d397019e..12b3d0625c6a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,49 @@ const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type)
>  	return btrfs_raid_array[type].raid_name;
>  }
>  
> +void btrfs_describe_block_groups(u64 bg_flags, char *buf, u32 size_buf)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int ret;
> +	char *bp = buf;
> +	u64 flags = bg_flags;
> +	u32 size_bp = size_buf;
> +
> +	if (!flags) {
> +		strcpy(bp, "NONE");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +#define DESCRIBE_FLAG(f, d) \

Macro arguments should be in ( ) in the body

> +	do { \
> +		if (flags & f) { \
> +			ret = snprintf(bp, size_bp, "%s|", d); \
> +			if (ret < 0 || ret >= size_bp) \
> +				return; \

Ok, this seems to be safe. snprintf will not write more than size_bp and
this will be caught if it overflows.

The return is obscured by the macro, I'd rather make it more visible
that there is a potential change in the code flow. The proposed change:

				goto out_overflow;
				...

and define out_overflow at the end of function. Same for the other
helper macros.

Also please align the backslashes of the macro a few tabs to the right.

> +			size_bp -= ret; \
> +			bp += ret; \
> +			flags &= ~f; \
> +		} \
> +	} while (0)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux