On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >> --- a/check/mode-lowmem.c
> >> +++ b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> >> @@ -1800,6 +1800,87 @@ static int repair_inline_ram_bytes(struct btrfs_root *root,
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +
> >> +static int check_file_extent_inline(struct btrfs_root *root,
> >> + struct btrfs_path *path, u64 *size,
> >> + u64 *end)
> >> +{
> >> + u32 max_inline_extent_size = min_t(u32, root->fs_info->sectorsize - 1,
> >> + BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE(root->fs_info));
> >> + struct extent_buffer *node = path->nodes[0];
> >> + struct btrfs_item *e = btrfs_item_nr(0);
> > btrfs_item_nr(path->slots[0])
> >
> > I think this fixes the problem.
>
> Indeed, the original code uses path->slots[0] as the slot whereas I've
> fixed that at slow 0, which of course is not always going to be the case.
>
> David will you fold this in the original patch ?
Yes I'll fold it. Thanks.
