Re: FS_IOC_FIEMAP fe_physical discrepancies on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



27.10.2018 18:45, Lennert Buytenhek пишет:
> Hello!
> 
> FS_IOC_FIEMAP on btrfs seems to be returning fe_physical values that
> don't always correspond to the actual on-disk data locations.  For some
> files the values match, but e.g. for this file:
> 
> # filefrag -v foo
> Filesystem type is: 9123683e
> File size of foo is 4096 (1 block of 4096 bytes)
>  ext:     logical_offset:        physical_offset: length:   expected: flags:
>    0:        0..       0:    5774454..   5774454:      1:             last,eof
> foo: 1 extent found
> #
> 
> The file data is actually on disk not in block 5774454 (0x581c76), but
> in block 6038646 (0x5c2476), an offset of +0x40800.  Is this expected
> behavior?  Googling didn't turn up much, apologies if this is an FAQ. :(
> 
> (This is on 4.18.16-200.fc28.x86_64, the current Fedora 28 kernel.)
> 

My understanding is that it returns logical block address in btrfs
address space. btrfs can span multiple devices so you will need to
convert extent address to (device,offset) pair if necessary.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux